Monday, July 26, 2010

Bhopal Gas Tragedy – Some Fictional Thoughts

Twenty-six years ago the city of Bhopal erupted in toxic fumes; sixty days ago the Indian Supreme Court delivered a disappointing verdict to compensate still-suffering victims. While the latter digest what little they’ve been awarded and newspapers publish concluding facts and editorials on the subject, it’s worth taking the time to read Indra Sinha’s ANIMAL’S PEOPLE and remember that sixteen and sixty years from now, Bhopal will still sting from the gas tragedy of 1984. As Sinha’s main character explains halfway through the book, “time doesn’t exist…Hope dies in places like this, because hope lives in the future and there’s no future here, how can you think about tomorrow when all your strength is used up trying to get through today?”

Twenty-six years ago the city of Bhopal erupted in toxic fumes; sixty days ago the Indian Supreme Court delivered a disappointing verdict to compensate still-suffering victims. While the latter digest what little they’ve been awarded and newspapers publish concluding facts and editorials on the subject, it’s worth taking the time to read Indra Sinha’s ANIMAL’S PEOPLE and remember that sixteen and sixty years from now, Bhopal will still sting from the gas tragedy of 1984. As Sinha’s main character explains halfway through the book, “time doesn’t exist…Hope dies in places like this, because hope lives in the future and there’s no future here, how can you think about tomorrow when all your strength is used up trying to get through today?”


A well-oiled machine in a factory hums with efficiency; India screeches and groans and whimpers, bearing the weight of one billion people. Some carry trays of vegetables on their backs calling out to customers, some stand with bent knees straight gazes fingers curled around a cricket bat as millions of eyes watch on, and some tap their feet with lazy urgency as they summon their drivers from airconditioned doorways. People face forward, their attention arrested at every angle by movie posters, honking trucks, buzzing crowds, brimming skies. When they look down, it’s to avoid garbage, shoo away a stray dog, or spit. Rarely is it to listen to a young boy with stumps for legs who locomotes around the slums of Khaufpur on a board with wheels.


ANIMAL’S PEOPLE is a book whose main character, Animal, makes the reader do just that, forcing him to confront exhaust pumps and feel the sun’s rays refracting off the burning roads. He is a young boy braving poverty and puberty with no legs, a birth defect, and he multitasks with attitude, dancing around pedestrians’ knees, developing a sore neck talking to people twice and thrice his height, and cursing passersby who annoy him. Animal teachers the reader to move a little slower, albeit more doggedly, towards food, friends and fights, proving over three hundred and fifty pages that he is the ideal narrator for a book about his people. Sinha operates close to the ground, creating his characters’ stories with an eye on their footsteps. Animal challenges the reader to acclimatize to a new topography; fitting for a city that now sits wearily on a fatal foundation of poison, for a community of people dehumanized enough that a main character prefers being called ‘Animal’ to anything else.


Animal is an orphan in a city orphaned by justice. Khaufpur is the fictional town that houses a factory responsible for the plague killing and affecting generations of its residents. The heart of the gas tragedy beats with each page of filth Animal shows the reader: “Platforms, ladders and railings are corroding. Its belly is a tangle of pipes like rotting guts…Look throughout this place a silent war is being waged…yet that night was a freezing night of stars.”


Animal’s friends and family share hearts and memories and money and homes between them since everyone lost something vital “that night.” Their voices rise with opinions and opposition, they orate about justice, protests, redemption. Animal faithfully shares these conversations with the reader in his unique language: he berates the “kampani,” wonders about the “jarnalis” eager for Animal’s story, learns “inglis” and confides in a doctress from “Amrika.” The closest person he has to a mother is a French nun, Ma Franci, and they share a methyl isocyanate-laced language of pidgin French and Hindi that only they understand. He loves a girl, Nisha, and suffers for it, expressing his unrequited love for her with pidgin attempts with words and scars on his knees from climbing trees. No real Indian story is complete without a love triangle or quadrilateral so Animal spends many pages on Nisha’s love, Zafar, and his love for judicial vendettas, while Nisha’s father and an American doctor navigate their own personal tragedies together.


Each street of Animal’s slum offers another story of devastation out of the days months years generations following “that night.” The poor writhe in smoke and dust, but the reader experiences fresh food and ripe relationships in Nisha’s part of town where musicians and doctors and philosophy exist. Animal learns about melody from Nisha’s father, hope from Elli doctors, research from Nisha, patience from Zafar, attachment from Ma Franci. His lust for happy endings—personally and publicly—propels the narrative through Khaufpur’s struggles and victories against the wretched factory’s retching curses: he desires girls, enlightenment, independence, pride, humanity, respect. Sinha bestows each of these on Animal in ways expected and unexpected; a parallel to the predictable and unforeseeable damage Khaufpur endures and overcomes, thus becoming a city worth writing about.


The Bhopal gas tragedy will always be worth reading about. Sinha’s book, a 2007 Man Booker Prize finalist, is a brutal and riveting place to start.

Book: ANIMAL'S PEOPLE, Indra Sinha, Simon and Schuster, 2007.

Monday, July 5, 2010

Mediterranean Diet

J'ai voyage au Sud de France avec mon cher Twin. Ces mots sont a lui.

Nice, France: July 2007

By the time we arrive in Nice, we are hungry; that is all we can think about. The omniscient town sets about nourishing us right away. First, an appetizer of sunshine, some lightheartedness on the side. We free our shoulders of backpacks at the hostel and turn right back around, heading south south south to the enticing beckons of the sea. I can’t hear it yet but you are already smitten, and we go as far south as the tram will take us before setting off on foot to find food. The wind whips our hair into a frenzy and sculpts curls into them. Afternoon gold is sprinkled our eyes causing everything around us to glitter. Street performers are dressed in rainbows and outrageous smiles, dancing to the rhythm of the frenzied crowds parading by. The restaurant tablecloths lick at our laps, teasing us into little dances of our own as we dig into crisp pizzas and fresh juices. And then we are off again, discovering the shadows that only a brazen sun and coy, narrow alleys can create. We climb so many stairs, we can’t tell if our hearts are beating from the beauty around us, the high altitudes we feel like we had reached, or the sheer exercise of countless steps beneath our tanned feet. Fresh-faced young children and terribly old men point us in all directions -- to their wares, their ancestry, their pets and their sea. And at once we become a part of their scenery, diving in and out of the shadows, hovering over tombstones and under outstretched trees as nimbly as the wind tugging at our souls and drawing smiles all over our faces.

With the sea in the background and the foreground, we nap. We pay refuge to the shaded greenery of Nice's history; laying down and watching the coast look back up at us. Our cheeks kiss the grass, our hair snuggles amongst the blades, our legs darken a little. The wind wakes us up and calls us down to the shore, where the sea froths cheekily at us. You are off in a flash; you are a part of the scenery long before I was. You are dolphining around while I get cosy on the pebbles, steadily intoxicating myself on the complacency that beaches generate so copiously. The sun jeers at us, daring you to swim farther and me to scandalize myself, and it is blushing a deep red when you emerge from the sea, clean, emptied and refreshed. I wait for more encouragement from the sun, scurrying in, praying for collective blindness. What a ride! What a sensation to completely let go and be carried by an entity bigger and deeper and richer than anything one can imagine on land. It feels like floating in space, or flying through the sky, and being constantly reminded of the matter around you as it whispers in your ears and tickles you in your depths, gently pushing you away from unwavering shore and drawing you into its blurry arms, tossing you occasionally back against the impassive beach to remind you of the potential the vast depths of the sea held, and pulling you back out again.

When we are both done confiding in the currents of the undiscovered, we rest, breathless, dripping. Back on the beach, we mark our territory with wet hair, cooling skin and shy bodies. The sea's hues of blues compete with the sun's array of reds, oranges, yellows, purples. Sunset comes upon us like an unsatisfied painter blotching his canvas without a thought for balance or buoyancy, yet somehow creating both with thousands of points of color. The sun, in its sagacity, knows to connect these dots and draw invincibly long rays of unrivaled, unadulterated color. Each ray demands an answer from our minds, an answer to the thoughts bouncing around our minds, as numerous as the rays in the sky. Can one capture happiness? Can one by kidnapped by it? What future lies hidden beyond the horizon, ablaze with the convergence of earth, water and fire? Can only silence match the sky's symphony? What is appropriate to be discussed as the sun sings its final aria of the evening, allowing the waves to smudge it away? Partly wet, partly dry, with water on our eyelashes and pebbles massaging our backs, we sat in stupefied silence, listening to the song of the ocean. The buildings respectfully drape themselves in evening robes of shadow. You, me, we sing the song of Nice and sunsets and cemeteries and old age and romance.

Then we walk. Into the lights and away from them. Into the crowds and out of them. With a sunset buzzing in our eyes, the sea lingering in our ears, having been cleansed, we walk. Where to next? But we don’t have to seek anything out. Intimacy invites us into its arms, embracing us with succulent food, heartfelt music and a decor as elaborate as a museum. We write our history, talking over candlelight and letting the musicians echo their sentiments off our bodies. Nourishment in Nice comes forth, whether we ask for it or not.

As we eventually climb up north towards bunkbeds in a hostel of starstruck strangers, we are treated to one last Nicoise overture of spontaneity and comfort. Three old men, jolly with age and waddling with good health sit robustly in the tram with memory and nostalgia fresh on their lips. Their muse appears as if on cue—a bedraggled busker with a guitar on his arm—and before long, all are singing along to old French songs while embarrassed granddaughters look on, strangers smile to themselves and tourists calibrate success on their cameras. One street performer with a guitar and three men with childhoods erase time from that tram, bringing us to the dizzying juncture of past and present, gifting us with an era we haven't lived in but get to participate in that very night.

From the streets to the gardens to the sea to the tram: it is all one nourishing, mothering museum documenting hope, happiness and insight yet to come.

Tuesday, June 15, 2010

Lost and Found

The curiosity and nervousness about jobs after college arrived with the routine frenzy of course registration and finals. As a math and economics student, could I compromise a posh corporate salary for a creative Masters degree or the idealism of public service? My parents urged me to be sensible: think of the independence you’ll have after working, earning and saving for a few years, they said. Do what we want first, it sounded like, and then what you want. I didn’t necessarily want to follow their example, but I didn’t know how to be original, either. Halfway through my third year at Columbia University, I believed my future lay muddled in the grid of New York City. Maybe I could work at the World Bank. Perhaps an economic think tank. Do the Peace Corps and then continue at the UN? I hadn’t yet found my coordinates.

Queens-bound for the first time some days later, I looked forward to pedestrian anonymity and the absence of a campus (and its career center). Venturing into the strange borough, my arrival was briskly anointed by sunlit graffiti and expressionless faces on the subway stairs. Signs advertised buses and subway superintendents, orienting me in the city’s tirelessly tired manner: Welcome to Queens. Now, please get out of the way. The cold wind funneling down the stairs shocked me into a sense of urgency, suddenly making me impatient as I joined the pile of people that bus stops create.

“Are you from India?” An Indian man my father’s age had interrupted my reverie. It was an oft-used innocent conversation starter, ice breaker and patriotic nod amongst Indians; I found that I didn’t dismiss him as summarily as I did most strangers in the city.

“Yes, I am. I’m actually looking for the Ganesh temple; do I take this bus?”

“Ah, I’m headed in that direction. I can show you the way. But don’t be mistaken – I’m not your guru.” His joke – was it a joke? – about not being my guru, my teacher or spiritual guide, caught me off-guard. I tried to humor him, thinking it would end the conversation. Far from it.

“Um, thanks. I suppose I’ll find my guru eventually.” I shifted my eyes to the bus pulling up to the curb.

“Actually, your guru will find you.” He climbed into the bus, gesturing for me to follow. I obliged in silence, hoping that quiet would preside over the rest of our time together. Again, I was mistaken.

This stranger, my neighbor, launched into a soliloquy about the many, and hidden, talents of a guru, and how effectively one could size up his students before guiding them to them their true paths, their destinies. He quoted the Bhagavad Gita, an ancient, practical, heavily-thumbed spiritual and ethical Hindu text, and praised its principal characters: Arjuna, a heroic prince at war; and Krishna, God descended to earth to restore peace to a troubled land and serve as Arjuna’s guru. Krishna, he said, volunteered to be Arjuna’s charioteer knowing full well that Arjuna would succumb to preemptive guilt and doubt about the war he was to start. At that crucial point, Krishna would redeem Arjuna and remind him of his duty, as only a guru could. I listened in silence – I hadn’t promised him a conversation – and nodded occasionally. The bus turned, and so did the man’s thoughts.

“What do you study?” I was startled by the question, so stereotypical of Indians, but so incongruous in context.

“Applied Math.” I didn’t bother with the other half of my degree; my education bore no relevance to his ministerial monologue.

“Mathematics, very good. And what do you want to do after you finish school?”

I hesitated. Was it worth telling this man that I was torn between the sensible and the spontaneous? I limited my answer to a breezy “oh, I’m not sure,” wary of his next speech about India’s plethora of mathematicians and engineers, so I limited my answer. For a third time that morning, I was wrong.

“You want to work at the World Bank, perhaps?” He fixed his eyes on mine, his head nodding slightly with the jostling bus, and I responded with a speechless stare.

“The World Bank? How on earth did you know that I’ve been thinking about exactly that for some time now? I never once mentioned the World Bank, or my Economics minor, in this conversation!”

My voice was raised and my words tumbled out, but he was not flustered. He smiled, completely in control.

“How can you not tell, by now, that I know who you are? That I can see through you, but I choose not to?”

This time I was silent simply because I did not know how to react. We swayed with the bus, as it pulled up to the curb.

“Ah, this is our stop. You need to go down this block and turn right, and you’ll get to the temple. Good luck with the rest of your life. So long!”

I mechanically thanked the bus driver and waved at the man. He was headed in the opposite direction, and I watched the distance between our backs increase. The irony of strangers in New York, I realized, is that while you may choose not to see them, they may have seen through you all along – and may also see you through, as only a guru can.


Saturday, June 5, 2010

All for a postage stamp

Book Talk: Pepita Seth presents her research on the Temple, showcasing her book, “Heaven on Earth”

- Seth spent 20 years living near Guruvayur and wrote the book over 7 years—“being a devotee of Guruvayurappa was part of the contract”

-
Historically, there was a Bhagavathi goddess worshipped in the spot where the Guruvayur temple now stands. To honour her presence, she continues to be worshipped at the temple and there is one puja focused on her (per the goddesses' request)

- Guruvayur temple is like a city state with its own management, routines, population—every day, the temple accounts are inscribed on a palm leaf and read to the Lord

- Guruvayurrappan statue stone is said to contain medicinal properties

- It is the devotees who humanize Guruvayurappan with their personalities, traits, emotions, understanding, and make Him accessible

- Ma
ny marriages take place there, and since arranged marriages are between people who have sometimes never met, there have been instances where people get married to the ‘wrong’ people—but they are sanctified by Guruvayurappan, so no matter!
- Devotees make all kinds of exorbitant offerings. One family had their 1-month old baby weighed in Rs.100 notes!

- The Keshanti (Head Priest) makes $45,000/year

- It’s in the details that the scale of the temple’s management is realized:

  • 14 families exclusively manage the institution of the Guruvayur temple—finances, making garlands, cleaning, lighting lamps, making the wicks for the lamps, etc.
  • Wick-makers, for example—roll the wicks on their thighs for years and years, leaving their skin forever calloused
- Guruvayur Kesavan elephant served the temple for 53 years, also known as “Raja Raja,” the king of elephants—treated as an incarnation of the Lord
-
Krishnanattam dances (different from Kathakali) tell the story of Krishna—performed over 8 days; those who watch the last performance, i.e. Krishna’s death, are supposed to stay and watch the 1st performance so they see Krishna’s birth, a more auspicious ‘ending’ to a performance
- Paatakani—storytellers at the temple who tell their stories simply and devotionally, no attempt to be witty, sarcastic, etc.

- Aanayottam—the annual elephant race, draws a lot of crowd and hoopla!

- The universe of the temple for the 9 days of Navrathri makes the outside world seem that much more chaotic and disturbing—imagine being the Keshanti of the temple and not leaving the temple ground for 6 months; that transition is very tough! “You see him get visibly thinner over his tenure!” says Seth.

See Hindu articles on Pepita Seth: http://beta.thehindu.com/arts/books/article52515.ece and http://www.thehindu.com/mag/2007/12/09/stories/2007120950120500.htm

The talk took place at Aicon Gallery and was organized by the Indo American Arts Council.

Saturday, May 15, 2010

Merchant of Venice, Brooklynized

Shakespeare’s Merchant of Venice

Performed by Watermill Theatre (UK) and Propeller Production

At the Brooklyn Academy of Music’s Harvey Theatre

On Friday, May 15th, 2009

A lengthy, painstaking, play-by-play (pun intended ;)

review, analysis and reminiscence:

Beware the length, for I have tried to distill

stage directions, dramatic license,

personal narrative and Shakespearean scripture

from my muddled memories.

Dedicated to

the ICSE English Literature exam,

British English spellers,

and dorky friends,

this is likely fit for not much else!

Custom often dictates that theatrical performances begin out of darkness (on stage) and quiet (in the audience). Coughs subside, electronic gadgets are silenced, lights dim and the heavy stage curtain trembles with anticipation. Then, footsteps as the characters assemble on stage, taking their cues from the blackness, and so the production begins. But not this play. As the audience files into their seats like Tetris shapes forming a dense, colourful array, the stage casually comes alive, too. The set, fully visible in the lit auditorium, is paradoxically inviting: pleasant-faced but grubby men pace about an impasse of jail cells that line the back and sides of the stage, settling into their specific cages. The audience admires the antique (but for those of the glass-half-empty school, the rusted and crumbling) décor of the auditorium and wonders at the bodies already on stage, stretching, bending, sitting – are the actors warming up, has the play already begun? But nighttime falls, the actors are obscured from the audience, and something is about to start – Shakespeare is coming alive!

How would one expect this play to begin? Perhaps with the opening words spoken by a distraught man pondering his despondence; perhaps on a street in Venice, crowded with cheer and chatter? No. In today’s production, Venice is captured inside a prison, and the audience is to witness a band of men telling a tale from behind bars – is this how Shakespeare would have envisioned it? A hearty drum roll stampedes into Act I Scene I: an a cappella percussion performance using prison bars, shoes on hard floors, cries and even a man on the Congos (the troupe performs several beautiful hymns over the course of the play: someone with perfect pitch begins, and the others fall into harmonies and melodies fit for a church!). A guard walks across the stage and blows a whistle and the men scramble from their cells – stacked as two levels so men have to climb out of their cells and ladder down to the stage – to line up for morning roll call. Another man, neither prison guard nor prisoner, in a curious all-white getup, speaks the first words of the play: “Bring forth the Christian and the Jew,” which is not from the original text, but another dramatic license exercised, and effectively. For two men from the line up step forward and the audience is face to face with kind Antonio and Shylock the cur.

With the audience sufficiently distracted by set and speech alike, the cast assumes convention, reassuring all that Shakespeare is still author of this play. “In sooth, I know not why I am so sad,” drones Antonio. As he speaks of his argosies cresting waves towards Tripoli, the Indies and England, the others mill about in their prison quarters, scrubbing the floor, doing push-ups, plotting in a corner and listening to Antonio. One by one, men in the crowd – Salarino, Solanio, Lorenzo, Gratiano and dear Bassanio – retort with entreaties to soothe Antonio’s troubled mind, and thus the cast takes shape. Antonio is robust and big-built, his sadness and “vinegar aspect” seem unworthy of his size and broad shoulders. But in fact it is a looming sadness, deeper than his shadow is tall, and lifted only when he has an opportunity to serve his close friend, Bassanio, whose Scottish accent accentuates his plea to Antonio for a loan of 3,000 ducats to woo a far-away maiden whose reputation has, from Belmont, reached the four corners of the world in excitable whispers, sly winks and love letters that are stained and crumpled with travel. Ornate requests are unnecessary, insists Antonio, claiming that Bassanio but “wind[s] about my love with circumstance,” for he is willingly “prest unto” anything Bassanio wishes. Meanwhile Shylock and his acquaintance lurk in another corner of the stage, ominously listening but not paying attention, as they dream up interest-friendly customer-unfriendly ‘typically Jewish’ schemes. And so far the audience is still looking into a prison, maybe wondering where Venice went, as the plot begins to unfold.

Scene II is a drastic change, as the men clamber into two cells on either side of the stage, clearing the way for a grand entrance. A new cast member, dressed scantily and with a feminine touch to him, announces, with a flick of his shawl, “By my troth, Nerissa, my little body is aweary of this world.” Another charismatic male, but this time playing a woman – for this is an all-male troupe! “You would be, sweet madam,” rejoins another man wearing even less: lacking stockings, he sports briefs and suspenders over bare skin, revealing his lower status – he is Nerissa, Portia’s quick-witted, light-footed maid (and he demonstrates his skills when the suitors arrive to unseal their caskets and seal their fates, with dances and twirls and slights-of-hand!). The audience, like Portia, is disturbed by the clumps of men at stage right and stage left, hankering and clamouring after these attractive and rare females – one expects they do not see many in prison – with crass gestures, hand motions, and other agitated body parts! Portia mourns her future, given the slim pickings of men before her – “I had rather be married to a death’s head with a bone in his mouth” – but her eyes widen when remembering a Venetian of promise named Bassanio. She and Nerissa prepare to receive still more suitors, and the scene swiftly changes to bring the men out of their cages and the women away to their chambers, for the audience is to meet the ultimate antagonist, Shylock, as he negotiates with a desperate Bassanio.

It’s in Scene III that Shylock speaks for the first time, his first words, appropriately, being about money: “Three thousand ducats; well.” Shylock is leaner than Antonio, but not as commanding; he sports a beard and a wry smile that contorts into a sneer when he curses Antonio’s accusations that he, Shylock, is a cruel money lender, imposing interest on innocents while pure-hearted Antonio indulges his clients with not just loans, but leniency. Shylock is both arrogant and defensive – “for sufferance is the badge of all our tribe” – as he scrutinizes Antonio’s standing and, upon meeting Antonio, mocks him – “I hate him for he is a Christian – and his profession with a bond that, if forfeited, would allow Shylock to extort a pound of flesh from Antonio. With the cunning only a Jew could muster, he asks,

Pray you, tell me this;

If he should break his day, what should I gain

By the exaction of the forfeiture?

To buy his favour, I extend this friendship:

If he will take it, so; if not, adieu;

And, for my love, I pray you wrong me not.

when in fact, Shylock will do anything in his power to “feed fat the ancient grudge” he bears the popular and kind-hearted Antonio. The unwitting and pure Antonio agrees to the bond in spite of Bassanio’s concern for “fair terms and a villain’s mind”, leaving the audience reeling in the polar exchanges between the Christian and the Jew, as a prison cage is wheeled to the center of the stage: the audience has moved to Belmont for Act II.

From a second-storey cell in Scene I, a man cheers frenetically by way of dramatic introduction, for he is the Prince of Morocco and has his eyes, heart and complexion of “burnish’d sun” set upon the fair and lovely Portia. He climbs down to the stage floor and bows deep before Portia, as Nerissa skips around the three caskets placed at the front of the stage, bathed in spotlight, each chandeliered by three keys hanging from above upon which an inscription dangles temptingly. Portia warns Prince Morocco with requisite caution ere he makes his choice, and they exit for dinner as “Gobbo, Launcelot Gobbo, good Launcelot or good Gobbo or good Launcelot Gobbo” takes the stage in Scene II to monotonously meander aloud through his thoughts, wondering if and how he can flee his master the Jew, the “very devil incarnal” and serve Bassanio instead. [Note: Old Gobbo does not appear in this rendition of the play, therefore much of the banter in Scene II between Launcelot and his father is not included.] Bassanio consents with Christian generosity, moving Launcelot to unexpected eloquence: “The old proverb is very well parted between my master Shylock and you, sir: you hath the grace of God, sir, and he hath enough.” Bassanio advises this same eloquence to Gratiano who wishes to accompany him to Belmont, asking that he “allay with some cold drops of modesty thy skipping spirit”, and the latter promises to acquire the air of “one well studied in a sad ostent” for their voyage together – but not before he and his friends “purpose merriment” at the masquerade ball that night!

Evening is nigh in Scene III and Launcelot bids adieu to sweet Jessica (a man with a headscarf and pitchy voice that lend sufficient ambiguity to the actor’s gender) chez Shylock, who entrusts him with a note to her beloved Lorenzo. As she disowns herself from her father’s behaviour, acknowledging lineage only “to his blood” and not “to his manners”, her lover plans in Scene IV to “take her from her father’s house” that same night, in disguise. Shylock is reluctant to leave his home and daughter in Scene V for a masquerade party with “Christian fools with varnish’d faces”, but motivates himself to “go in hate, to feed upon the prodigal Christian” which he loves to do. The set is still before prison cells which, stacked and aligned as they are, they become a two storey house with many doors and windows. Shylock hides his money in the tank of a commode and wrings his wrists in front of a bunk bed in disarray – “there is some ill a-brewing towards my rest” – giving the audience a glimpse into the miserly lifestyle of wretched Shylock and his helpless daughter. With the moon on its ascent in Scene VI, Lorenzo meets his friends outside Shylock’s house where they make haste with Jessica and her father’s money, “for the close night doth play the runaway” and Lorenzo assures himself, his friends and the audience that he loves Jessica “heartily” and intends to enshrine her “in my constant soul”.

Scene VII has the audience and cast back in Belmont. A nourished Prince Morocco advances towards the caskets while Portia watches from an isolated cell, perhaps her room, cloaked in anxiety and shrouded behind cell bars that imply a will-he-or-won’t-he sentiment. Morocco is brazen, brash and, ultimately, blighted: his incorrect reasoning that “A golden mind stoops not to shows of dross” leads him to the golden casket where he expects “an angel in a golden bed lies all within”. Having pranced around the stage, lauded his desired conquest and cleansed his logic of tainted lead, he unlocks the golden casket – the biggest one on the stage – to reveal a scroll rebuking his efforts. Learning that “Gilded tombs do worms infold,” he parts with a heavy heart and a “labour lost”.

Disappointment carries over into Scene VIII where Antonio’s friends worry about Shylock’s “passion so confused at losing both daughter and ducats, and the consequences on Antonio if his vessels, “richly fraught”, end up “miscarried” and for naught. They pause to marvel at Antonio’s magnanimity – “a kinder gentleman treads not the earth” – and his sincere blessings to Bassanio “with affection wondrous sensible” when they parted, Bassanio hoping to win a heart and Antonio hoping not to forfeit his.

Back in Belmont for Scene IX, the next daring Prince, of Arragon, marches purposefully about the stage, meticulously swearing the oath that, if he chooses wrong, he will leave at once, containing his choice as confidential regret so as not to bias other suitors. He is tall and thin, dressed impeccably and with a twinkle in his eye. He claps his hands and snaps his fingers and rubs his palms invigoratingly – he is ready. He jumps into the fray with an ego perhaps surpassing Prince Morocco, vowing not to “jump with common spirits” and choose what so many others desire. Refusing to dilute his esteemed love with the superficiality of the “barbarous multitudes” below him,

for who shall go about

To cozen fortune and be honourable

Without the stamp of merit?

He attests to his fully deserved dignity and selects the silver casket. His long-spun logic yields but a mirror, showing him “the portrait of a blinking idiot” and revealing to him too late his foolish reasoning. He concedes, however, with a realistic farewell: With one fool’s head I came to woo, But I go away with two.” Portia, stepping out of her barred chambers wonders who will rescue her from these “desperate fools”, and is presently informed of an “ambassador of love” approaching Belmont. Could this be the man who starts the next chapter of Portia’s life?

Suspense heralds Act III Scene I as well, as Antonio’s friends fear the words for his ships “wrecked on the narrow ships”. Shylock appears, curious about Antonio and destroyed about Jessica, and catches the two men at a vulnerable time. Taunts from Salarino about Jessica causes Shylock to attack him like a snake: instantly he has him in a chokehold. Enraged at what is already lost and what could still be lost, he beats Salarino and ends up ripping Salarino’s eye out of his socket. Solanio and others gang up on Shylock, throwing chairs at him. Releasing Salarino, Shylock takes comfort in his bond with Antonio, at least there he has some control. But would he really extract a pound of flesh? Of course, he roars! “If it will feed nothing else, it will feed my revenge.” Dodging chairs and other flying objects, circling the stage with Antonio’s followers, Shylock screams about the rights of a Jew, “Hath not a Jew eyes? Hath not a Jew hands…? If you prick us, do we not bleed?...and if you wrong us, shall we not revenge?” The fight is over only when Shylock’s servant Tubal arrives with news of Antonio’s ships, at which point Solanio helps a blinded, battered Salarino off stage. Grieving daughter and ducats, he delights at Antonio’s misfortunes: “I’ll plague him; I’ll torture him: I am glad of it.”

Scene II begins with caution cast over Belmont. Portia, engaging Bassanio from her cage, urges him to “tarry”. Bassanio confesses an urgent, desperate love, “but let me to my fortune and the caskets,” so as not to “live upon the rack” any longer, but to become his destiny. Portia instructs there to be song, and the crowd on stage – Portia, Nerissa, Gratiano and others – begin a beautiful hymn, Gratiano serenading the audience with Bassanio’s thoughts – “where is fancy bred?” Bassanio, inspecting the three caskets, attentively notes that “the world is still deceived with ornament” that is “but the guiled shore to a most dangerous sea.” Rejecting extravagance, he confidently seizes the inscription to the leaden casket whose “paleness moves me more than eloquence,” yanks the key and thrusts it into the box. Joy and exaltation follow, from Bassanio, Portia, Gratiano and Nerissa – almost culminating in a kiss (between two men!). All are blissful in disbelief, humbling themselves before their prize – Portia as an “unlesson’d girl, unschool’d, unpractised” and Bassanio “doubtful whether what I see be true”. Love is consummated with a ring Portia gifts Bassanio and a vow between Gratiano “who beheld the maid” and pursued Nerissa while Bassanio confronted the caskets. But company interrupts: Lorenzo, Jessica and Solanio arrive with a letter from Antonio containing “few of the unpleasant’st words that ever blotted paper,” for they doom their author to death at the hand of an undeserving Jew. Bassanio’s Scottish accents spits over Antonio’s woes, and Portia and him conspire to help Antonio before they lie as husband and wife.

Scene III is, most appropriately to the stage, between Shylock, Salarino, Antonio and a Gaoler. Antonio stands lugubriously in a jail cell located center stage while Shylock rails at him with lunatic obsession:

I’ll have my bond; I will not hear thee speak:

I’ll have my bond; and therefore speak no more…

I’ll have no speaking; I will have my bond.

The others stand about with embarrassing and frustrating impotence; nothing can be done to evade the law which, “if it be denied, ‘t will much impeach the justice” of Venice. Antonio prays only that his eyes may rest on Bassanio one last time before his execution the following day. Meanwhile, Belmont bustles with Portia’s plans in Scene IV who, claiming refuge in a nearby monastery, dispatches a servant for disguises and qualifications as a doctor. She and Nerissa are to be “both accoutered like young men” with bravado, a “manly stride” and access to the court of Venice.

Scene V gently prefaces the climactic court scene with some light-hearted banter of Jewish-Christian enmity. Launcelot, ne’er one to mince his words, glibly fears for Jessica, “for truly I think you are damned,” since marrying a Christian does nothing but “raise the price of hogs.” Lorenzo quickly appeases his new bride, but not before chastising Launcelot with some verbal ammunition and “tricksy word” of his own. Humor mixes with hunger and they are off to dinner, leaving the audience staring at empty jail cells and wondering what is to become of Antonio.

Act IV Scene I: A court of justice locked up in a prison; advocates trying to read a bond between the lines. A wall of jail cells whose bars look like teeth bared at the unfortunate Antonio, who stands surrendered to a prison cell. The Duke, administering the trial, is the same man in all white from the opening scene of the play, and the audience understands his position in this final act of the play. This Duke feels for Antonio, and so does the rest of the court – indeed, a mournful song is being sung by the men, creating it out of nowhere yet again, and dividing it into four parts of equal and perfect harmony – but justice belongs to the law which is lettered in a bond which is bound to a pound of Antonio’s flesh, and there seems no way out. Shylock strides in, with a weighing scale in one hand, his bond in the other and a pristine sneer on his face. The Duke begs Shylock for mercy one final time, remarking that, “touch’d with human gentleness and love”, Shylock ought to provide “a gentle answer.” Shylock rejects the gentle and gentile, invoking a whimsical façade of a reason to harm Antonio: “for affection, mistress of passion, sways it to the mood of what it likes or loathes,” when in fact, “hates any man the thing he would not kill?” Thus he is induced, out of a forest of revenge overcast by clouds of rage, to carry out the bond instead of granting pardon. Scorning the bags of ducats Bassanio throws at him, causing coins to rain and scatter everywhere, Shylock calls up to the Duke, whose seat extends out of one of the top storey jail cells and give him a seat of authority and power, “I stand for judgement: answer; shall I have it?” The Duke has a final caveat: that the distinguished Doctor Bellario, from Padua, be represented at the court. Lo and behold, Nerissa and Portia, clerk and doctor, manifest to the court’s “gracious acceptance, whose trial shall better publish his commendation.” There is a visible groan of despair at the doctor’s appearance – he seems young, inexperienced and lost. “Which is the merchant here, and which the Jew?” he seeks, prompting court members to throw their hands up – does the doctor not even know this much? – and the audience to titter knowingly about Portia’s latent cunning. The Duke then echoes his words from the outset of the play some two hours before: “Antonio and old Shylock, both stand forth.” The audience has finally traveled full circle, from roll call in the prison to roll call of those assembled at Antonio’s trial. Portia looks strange to the audience and her own husband, for she is bulky in a trenchcoat and paces with a heavy, important tread. And yet, she turns to Antonio (which could have been this particular director’s stage direction) and asks, “Is your name Shylock?” The audience smiles and the court gasps and Shylock speaks up boldly, encouraged by the youth’s incompetence: “Shylock is my name.” Portia wastes no time, she is immediately upon him to “be merciful” with that time-tested, pro-faith, globally transacted speech about mercy (that brings back memories of English class on hot afternoons in Cathedral and delights me to publish here) –

The quality of mercy is not strain’d

It droppeth as the gentle rain from heaven

Upon the place beneath: it is twice blest;

It blesseth him that gives and him that takes:

’T is mightiest in the mightiest: it becomes

The throned monarch better than his crown;

His sceptre shows the force of temporal power,

The attribute to awe and majesty,

Wherein doth sit the dread and fear of kings,

It is an attribute to God himself;

And earthly power doth then show likest God’s

When mercy seasons justice. Therefore Jew,

Though justice be thy plea, consider this,

That, in the course of justice, none of us

Should see salvation: we do pray for mercy;

And that same prayer doth teach us all to render

The deeds of mercy

Noting Shylock’s crazed look, Portia acknowledges to the court that “there is no power in Venice can alter a decree established,” instantly winning Shylock’s praise, which he has dealt stingily until now. The bond passes hands, exchanges mathematical calculations for ducats “thrice thy money,” and, weightlessly floating about the court, ekes a deeper and more deadly pound from Antonio for each time it is read aloud. When Portia recommends “some surgeon” to attend to Antonio’s wounds once the deed is done, Shylock refuses: “I cannot find it; ’t is not in the bond” – this apparent death sentence is to become Antonio’s saviour.

By now Antonio has stripped – his shirt and jacket deliberately unbuttoned, folded and draped over a caring man’s arm – and he stands tall, half naked, with eyes both glaring and defeated staring into an uncertain future. He bids a fond farewell to his friend, reminding him with the majesty of a fallen soldier devoted to his country, “repent but you that you shall lose your friend, and he repents not that he pays your debt.” Bassanio has fallen at Antonio’s knees and holds his wrist close to his lips to kiss them and moisten with his tears. Moved, he cries, “life itself, my wife, and all the world, are not with me esteem’d above thy life” and the audience suffers pangs of regret and separation as Portia stamps her delicate foot and impatiently reminds Bassanio that his wife “would give you little thanks for that”. Shylock interrupts the quibbling with the vigorous sharpening of a knife he has drawn out of his pocket, that he brings closer and closer to Antonio’s chest. Prolonging the suspense, he uses a pen to mark where on Antonio’s torso he wishes to carve out the pound – closest to his heart, per the bond – and the audience’s collective heart thuds with every passing second. Antonio trembles slightly, eyes and teeth gritted together; the court holds its breath; Portia and Nerissa stare wildly at the bond hoping for inspiration and Shylock practices sinking his knife into willing flesh. And then, just as Shylock is about to thrust the knife into skin, Portia shouts, “Tarry!”

The bond explicitly states that Shylock may have a pound of flesh and affords for nothing else, neither surgeon nor money – nor blood! Portia rules that, per the bond, ‘if thou dost shed one drop of Christian blood, thy lands and goods are, by the laws of Venice, confiscate unto the state of Venice,” and the play peaks at its climax. Antonio’s friends are flooded with relief, and they call out to the “upright,” “learned” judge to preach some more. Shylock awkwardly asks for his original bond amount, and when that is refused, settles for his principal. “Why then the devil give him good of it!” he shouts, tail between his legs. But Portia yanks on his leash one more time, accusing him that “directly and indirectly too thou has contrived against the very life of the defendant,” and is, by law, at the mercy of the court. The Duke on high and Antonio, dressed and renewed, grant pardon, swiftly whisking Shylock’s money into trusts for his estranged daughter and diverting his religious pursuit to the more noble ways of a Christian. Shylock, by now on the floor, broken and weak, can hardly move. Refuged in the fetal position, eyes closed, voice murmuring, he succumbs to Antonio’s wishes, and crawls away from the court’s jeers. Exit Shylock.

His departure marks an abrupt shift in tone and gravity: Bassanio offers all of himself to Portia the doctor who slyly asks him for his ring. Bassanio’s refusals encourages Portia’s demands and emboldens her love for him and, happy with the failed attempt, shares a triumphant wink with Nerissa before they exeunt the stage. Scene II wraps up the case, as Portia and Nerissa confirm Shylock’s signature on the deed (he is absent from the stage) and hasten to Belmont before their freshly married husbands arrive, refreshed by victory and vindicated for flesh of their own! The woman are interrupted by Gratiano who bears a ring for Portia, inducing Nerissa to seduce her ring from Gratiano as well – they exit the stage with Nerissa calling after Gratiano, somewhat comically, “Sir, I would speak with you.”

The moon is back in Act V Scene I, as are its keen followers, Lorenzo and Jessica, who tread and trip softly through the threshes of new-found love, nervously finding their footing with each other. Launcelot and others come as harbingers of Portia and Nerissa as well as a “horn full of good news”. Lorenzo is moved to excitement and eloquence, praising the moon and his lady love, while the troupe showers gentle musical notes across the stage and onto the audience, as they are wont to do, and so graciously! Portia and Nerissa arrive, and close at their heels are Bassanio, Antonio, Gratiano and other revellers from the court. While Bassanio introduces his dearest friend to his dainty wife, quarrel abound from off stage – Nerissa chases after a frantic Gratiano and slaps him silly, now onstage, and the audience is greatly entertained by the ensuing tussle over a missing ring. Portia boasts that her Bassanio would never do such a thing, and is quickly proven wrong by a desperate Gratiano. The stage is aflame with catty women despising the men – those lowly creatures! – before them, mute to their husbands’ pleas. Once satisfied with her own trickery, Portia quells the torment with a truce, brandishing the letter that allowed her into court some hours earlier: “There you shall find that Portia was the doctor, Nerissa there her clerk”. With momentum, she announces that Antonio’s ships are in fact safe, and Nerissa echoes the sentiments for Lorenzo, who is to inherit Shylock’s assets when the Jew is no longer. It is agreed that Portia and Nerissa have outdone themselves, having doled out “manna in the way of starved people”, and they accept it with an invitation for those “not satisfied of these events at full” to probe – and penetrate – them further in the bedroom!

Winking, smiling, yawning, rejoicing, the cast bows, the curtain sweeps them away and the audience breaks into applause, as custom often dictates.

Thursday, April 22, 2010

Sing

Inhale air and exhale music

The invisible becomes audible

The ambient becomes iambic

Thoughts become notes

Taught and taut

Floating

Reaching

Teaching

Rising

Shrinking with distance

Like stones skipping over the ocean

Leaping towards the horizon

Waves announce themselves

And recede

Melodies peak and dip

Chests rise and fall

Breathe

Enter the reservoir of sound

Sing